Category Archives: Activism

Lacey & Larkin Immigration Assistance, Saving a Nation

Published / by Alice / Leave a Comment

Migrants tend to be significantly more oppressed because of their immigration status. While politicians are speaking about who is able to lawfully cross a boundary, migrants are still wondering: Can the boss under-pay me again? Who would take care of my kids if I’m deported? Can the color of my skin change my chances in court? Can they let me out of detention in time for my ninth birthday?

Before this month, delegates from countries across the globe met in the United Nations at Geneva, Switzerland, to begin with a very long process prior to negotiating a worldwide contract on migration. Learn more about Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin:

Nations are trusting that in 2018 that they are going to have the very first US deal covering a variety of global migration in a holistic and comprehensive way. This is a tough endeavor anytime, but particularly in an era when migration coverages and xenophobia have become increasingly controversial. Read more: Village Voice Media | Wikipedia and Jim Larkin |

Migrants are eligible for individual rights by virtue of their humanity. But these rights are currently codified in an isolated patchwork of both treaty and customary global law, which will not set the rights for people crossing boundaries given adequate consent. The International Migrants Bill of Rights Initiative attempts to make sure that, within their efforts to obtain compromise, countries do not detract from present human rights law enforcement.

The Larkin and Lacey example began when both were taken from their own homes and imprisoned. The purpose in their kidnapping appeared to be a tactic for persuading them into giving away some incriminating evidence which they had on the County Sheriff of Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio.

The case got much more fascinating when police officers detained both men and started making requirements for the titles of their internet information sources.

For the past ten Decades, the duo was in and out of court. Since their victory, they’ve gotten a payoff of $37.5 million from the county. The 2 have decided that they won’t use the cash obtained for their sake; rather, they are going to put it to use in order to assist immigrant citizens of Arizona who might be going through similar issues.

Both have spent nearly all of their livelihood defending the rights of Americans as stipulated from the First Amendment. The conflict they’ve been fighting was fierce, and so they have hardly any aid. The cash they’ll get as reimbursement will probably help all migrants who have immigration problems with the US-Mexico boundary.

End Citizens United Aims To Overhaul The Election Campaign Finance Laws In The US

Published / by Alice / Leave a Comment

After a series of debates and a long-standing argument that whether the latest United States Presidential Elections were rigged or not, it has at least come to the light that there was some truth to the rumors. There was, in fact, a Russian company that was linked to Kremlin that ran some politically influenced Ads on Facebook. The political ads published by this Russian company had the motive to influence the election campaign of the United States. It points to the fact that the election based laws of the United States is either weak or the election machinery is too weak to have not filtered any influence from the foreign entity.

To ensure that the current United State’s President Donald Trump and his team has no connection with this Russian company that ran political ads on Facebook, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been appointed. He would be determining whether Trump has played any role in this episode or if he has any connections with this event. However, even though the reputation of Robert Mueller suggests that he would dive deep into the matter to find the truth, there are serious concerns as to whether the Washington would do the same or cooperate in ensuring that happens. As per the campaign finance laws in the United States, there is no limit to how much money an individual or an organization pumps into the elections.


It is this campaign finance law that the End Citizens United, a political action committee, is fighting against. End Citizens United wants to end this law as the flow of campaign money can sway the politicians to work for the interest of their donors rather than the country’s general population. It would create a bias in the judgment of the politicians and the way the government functions. The incident of Russian company intruding the United States’ election only indicates how vulnerable such a campaign finance law can make our country.

End Citizens United works with the grass root donors and does not take large sums of money from wealthy individuals or huge organizations, but thrives on the small donations given by everyday people. The End Citizens United PAC has also helped in bringing awareness about the campaign finance laws in the US among the uninformed public, and why it needs to be overhauled for the long-term benefit of the country. End Citizens United aims to overhaul the campaign finance laws in the future with the help of people’s support and by creating more massive awareness.

Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin – The Story Behind the Origin of the Frontera Fund

Published / by Alice / 1 Comment on Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin – The Story Behind the Origin of the Frontera Fund

Human Rights are important relationships that should exist between the citizens and the government that looks over them. The government is responsible for the basic needs of its people and to protect them from being exploited. The best thing that human rights are that it is for everyone and is guaranteed internationally. The same goes for immigration rights. In the United States, the immigration rights have been in existence for very long, but today it has become a matter of disputes. Read more: Michael Larcey | Crunchbase

It is quite evident that the Trump administration is doing everything they can to take away this right of the immigrants in the country. To fight the injustice, many different organizations work towards achieving these rights for the immigrants in the US. These organizations, most of them non-profit work against this injustice to allow every person in the country to live peacefully. Among the many, two top institutions that have been in the news are the Foundacion Mexico and the American Immigration Council.

Foundacion Mexico has its headquarter in Arizona and helps Mexicans in the country to earn a college degree. Often people do not have the means to get a college degree, and this is where the foundation comes into play.

They offer a scholarship to deserving students with the excellent academic background to get into college. Even those who do not have the right papers and are immigrants in the country can seek their help to get an education in the US. Another organization with the name of the American Immigration Council aims to improve the immigrant situation in the country.

They offer many educational exchange programs to allow the citizens to learn more about the immigrants and their history. They also hold educational sessions for those looking to find out how the immigrants in the country contribute towards its rich culture and heritage. They also work with lawyers to provide immigrants in the country legal help.

Another group that has made a name for fighting for the benefits of the immigrants in the country is the Frontera Fund that was set up by Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin. There is an incident that took place back in 2007 that led to the emergence of the organization. Mike and Jim were both arrested by the then Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio from their homes. They were shoved into the SUVs and were then kept in separate jail.

They were arrested because they wrote an article against the Sheriff for his misdeeds that he did not like. Both of them working as journalists for the Phoenix New Times wrote a piece about the mismanagement and the financial irregularities that were plaguing the Sheriff department, and they had all the proofs for the same. Learn more about Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey: and

After a countrywide outcry, the two were released within 24 hours, and the charges against them were dropped. It was then that they decided to file a case against the country on First Amendment rights and won.

The settlement amount of $3.7 million that they won was used to set up the Frontera Fund to help people against racial and civil rights abuses.

Is Sanders The Only Choice?

Published / by Alice

In his recent interview on Fox News, Thor Halvorssen, the president of the Human Rights Foundation, discussed his conflict with the current election in regards to appointing a socialist President.

Halvorssen has extensive knowledge on individuals abusing power in the name of good,evil, or greed, with most of his studies focused on corrupt dictatorships through out the world. His discussion begins by clarifying that in the hands of an authoritative government, such as the U.S, socialism can be no different from Communism or Marxism, as the temptation to abuse power is all to real. Halvorssen does however clarify that Bernie Sanders is still his choice for President come election time, even mentioning that he has contributed to his campaign.

The interview seems rather directed by the hostess’ questions, as she attempts to elicit a direct negative quote about Socialism from Mr.Thor Halvorssen. However, he remains focused on his key point of potential for abuse, rather than an actual problem with the style of government. His extensive knowledge of dictatorships is clearly at work here, as he follows up most questions with an answer referring to Hillary’s “contributions” from many of the most infamous human rights abuse countries around the world.

On the other end of the spectrum we’re presented with Donald Trump, who has many policies on the table that are greatly disliked by many in America. Discussing him is in fact so toxic to the interview and obvious, that the hostess herself holds up a hand saying no further mention is needed besides, “Republican Front runner”.

In all, he expresses concern with establishing a Socialist government in a system that is known for abuse already, but concedes that voting for any of the other candidates is detrimental to the health of the country.